latimer ip
home
service
staff
digest
publications
clients
links
contact
     
 
U.S. PATENT LAW
First published in April 2005, the Annotated Patent Digest is a “go-to” resource for federal judges, patent practitioners and legal commentators addressing matters of U.S. patent law.

Spanning forty-four chapters, in seven volumes, and well over 14,000 pages, the Annotated Patent Digest provides comprehensive coverage of U.S. patent law principles and authority, including statutes; legislative histories; PTO regulations; pertinent MPEP provisions; and Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, CCPA, and district court precedent addressing both substantive and procedural aspects of litigating patents or procuring patents in the PTO.

By reviewing and analyzing on a daily basis every Federal Circuit published and unpublished patent-related opinion, and every U.S. federal district court patent case published on Westlaw, Mr. Matthews keeps himself and the Annotated Patent Digest continuously updated on the most recent legal developments and trends in U.S. patent litigation.

Thomson-West, the nation’s largest legal publisher, publishes the Annotated Patent Digest in a seven-volume hard copy edition. West also carries the Annotated Patent Digest on its Westlaw electronic database under the database identifier “ANPATDIG.” On Westlaw, the Annotated Patent Digest is updated on a monthly basis. It is supplemented annually in hard copy.

Based on his years of experience in crafting patent briefs and understanding what practitioners truly need from a treatise to draft winning briefs, Mr. Matthews engineered the structure of the case cites of the Annotated Patent Digest to quickly provide a practitioner with sufficient information to know if a case likely has true merit for citing in a legal brief or a response to a PTO office action.

As a significant point of distinction, most treatises contain footnote string cites to support a stated legal proposition. These footnote string cites often do not include information critical to knowing whether the case is worth citing in a brief or to fully understand the factual context of when a given legal proposition properly applies. Indeed, many footnote string cites include a case cite and perhaps a quote stating the legal proposition, but upon reading the case it becomes evident that the court found an exception to the proposition or merely stated the proposition in passing dicta. Such cases generally do not instill persuasive power to arguments made in a brief.

In the Annotated Patent Digest, instead of footnote string cites Matthews provides individual case cites having detailed parentheticals. Each case parenthetical typically includes three important elements: i) a quotable quote from the court stating the legal proposition; ii), a summary of the relevant facts and how the court applied the proposition in view of those facts; and iii) the ultimate outcome of the case. Armed with this information, a practitioner will quickly know whether a given case is likely to support a contention made in a brief, opinion, or PTO response. {To see a sample section of the Annotated Patent Digest with representative case parenthetiticals click on the following link § 23:13.50 Simultaneously Claiming an Apparatus and Method of Using the Apparatus}

As shown by the Chapter Listings below, the Annotated Patent Digest covers the full spectrum of issues encountered in litigating patents and a wealth of material applicable to prosecuting patent applications before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Of its forty-four chapters, thirty four are directed to substantive issues of patent law. The remaining ten chapters address procedural issues as applied specifically to patent litigation. In each chapter, the significant legal aspects of the subject matter are presented in numerous individual sections and organized with a comprehensive table of contents for ease of searching.

Chapter Listings (click on chapter name to see Table of Contents for each individual chapter)
Chapter 1:  General Aspects of a Patent
Chapter 2:  Sources of Legal Authority
Chapter 3:  General Principles & Procedures for Construing Patent Claims
Chapter 4:  Using a Term's "Ordinary" Meaning in Claim Construction
Chapter 5:  Using the Specification to Construe Claims
Chapter 6:  Using the Prosecution History to Construe Claims
Chapter 7:  Extrinsic Evidence, Validity Considerations, and
                      Prior Adjudications in Claim Construction
Chapter 8:  Claim Construction of Means-Plus-Function Limitations
Chapter 9:  General Principles of Infringement, Enforcement Period,
                      and Standing
Chapter 10:  Infringing Acts
Chapter 11:  Infringement Defenses
Chapter 12:  Proving Infringement & Literal Infringement
Chapter 13:  Doctrine of Equivalents
Chapter 14:  Prosecution History Estoppel
Chapter 15:  General Principles of Validity
Chapter 16:  Patent Applications
Chapter 17:  Novelty — 35 U.S.C.A. § 102
Chapter 18:  Obviousness
Chapter 19:  Double Patenting
Chapter 20:  Utility & Enablement
Chapter 21:  Best Mode
Chapter 22:  Written Description
Chapter 23:  Sufficiency of Claiming — § 112, 2
Chapter 24:  Miscellaneous Validity Requirements
Chapter 25:  Post-Issuance Corrections
Chapter 26:  Inventorship & Priority of Invention
Chapter 27:  Inequitable Conduct & Unclean Hands
Chapter 28:  Patent Misuse
Chapter 29:  Design Patents
Chapter 30:  Damages for Patent Infringement
Chapter 31:  Willful Infringement
Chapter 32:  Injunctive Relief
Chapter 33:  Attorney Fees
Chapter 34:  Bad-Faith Enforcement of Patent Rights
Chapter 35:  Patent Assignments
Chapter 36:  Jurisdiction & Venue
Chapter 37:  Declaratory Judgments
Chapter 38:  Preclusion by Prior Adjudications
Chapter 39:  Pre-Trial Procedure
Chapter 40:  Summary Judgment
Chapter 41:  Discovery
Chapter 42:  Privileges & Waiver
Chapter 43:  Post-Trial & Appellate Procedure
Chapter 44:  Evidentiary Issues
For information from Thomson West on ordering a hard copy of the Annotated Patent Digest click here (this link will redirect you to the Thomson West on-line catalog)



  © 2006 - 2007 Latimer, Mayberry & Matthews Intellectual Property Law, L.L.P.